Explain Advantages and Disadvantages of the Process of Amending the Constitution

Explain advantages and disadvantages of the knead of amending the validation 15 marks in that location address of amending the US formation is a desire process with hemorrhoid of checks and balances bring ond by the founding fathers this was to limit radical and habitual amendments. The first part of the process is proposing an amendment this keep be done in 2 ways, firstly by having two-thirds of both homes of the coupled States Congress acquiesce to the proposal, or by anational conventionassembled at the request of thelegislaturesof at least two-thirds of thestates agreeing to the proposal.To confuse a proposed amendment become part of the US constitution the proposed amendment commands to ratified, by having e actually ? of the states (38 states) agree to ratify the proposal or by holding state ratifying conventions in ? of the states, however this method has yet been use once.One advantage of the process of amending the constitution is that it protects the constitu tion from frequent smorgasbord to do with touristy opinion, it centre that to amend the constitution the amendment has to be sensible and needed at not slightlything to be taken lightly, this can be shown by the fact that the constitution has only been amended 27 eras which shows change is possible exclusively not in any cocktail dress easy that it changes the historic values that the States was built upon, helps control one political party controlling power.This is an advantage as it means that when a party comes into power (e. g. re overtans) they cannot go and make lashings of amendments that benefit them or are in their opinion, as the house of representatives usually as around 50/50 republican democrats proportion and you need 2/3 to have a proposal accepted. The system is democratic as 38/50 must agree which means its fair and reduces the chance of lots of unnecessary changes.One Disadvantage is that the process is time consuming which means that if an amendment is popular with the public e. g. banning throttles due to increased gun crime then it may be rejected by republicans which means it a no, however this was the point when the constitution was created, and was on purpose made difficult to amend. However some would argue that its so heavy to amend that it cannot move with the modern quantify freely.Another disadvantage is that because of the difficulties of amending the constitution it has led to the compulsive mash assuming the role, this is when the supreme court rules on a case that something is unconstitutional which means that local governments can try whether to enforce their decisions. In an extreme case if amendment proposals are unremittingly being rejected then a new constitution may branch off to create these new amendments in a die constitution wiping out the existing one.In destruction the process of amending the constitution is a long and tedious one but it makes indisputable that an amendment has to be supported by a large percentage and something that should be taken seriously, this means that there is not lots of amendments which could jeopardise the historic values of the American constitution, and also make the nation little stable as there is constant change which could confuse people. Lastly the process of amending the constitution is confusing and frustrating but without it America could be changed radically very quickly.